Game On! Great New Sports Books

Ludtke sued Ueberroth’s predecessor, Bowie Kuhn, in federal court docket — and received. “The court held that Ludtke had been treated differently than her colleagues based solely on her gender,” Julie DiCaro writes in SIDELINED: Sports, Culture, and Being a Woman in America (Dutton, 288 pp., $27). Ludtke’s victory was slim — it pertained solely to the Yankees — however it paved the way in which for Ueberroth’s leaguewide choice seven years later.

DiCaro is a former host on Chicago sports activities radio and presently a author and editor at Deadspin. Her e-book champions the work of girls like Ludtke, who refused to tolerate a sexist established order. It’s additionally a cri de coeur concerning the present state of sports activities media, the place ladies stay at a drawback. “I often say to people that I had it a lot easier than women do today,” Ludtke instructed DiCaro.

In no small half, that’s as a result of introduction of social media. Ludtke was attacked for having the temerity to demand equal entry, however largely by columnists who needed to signal their names to their views. The anonymity afforded by Twitter has led to new depths of viciousness. When DiCaro was on the air in Chicago, the mere sound of a feminine voice was greater than many male listeners might bear. According to her critics, DiCaro’s voice “was simultaneously too high, too low, too shrill, too girly, too raspy.” One commenter, at the least, was prepared to come clean with what these critiques have been actually about. “I tune into sports radio to get AWAY from women,” he wrote.

DiCaro’s “amateur vocal coaches” are amongst her extra mild-mannered antagonists. In 2016, she appeared in a video based mostly loosely on Jimmy Kimmel’s “Mean Tweets” section. The video’s producers invited males to learn aloud, to DiCaro’s face, tweets that different males had written about her. The ensuing footage is excruciating to look at: As the messages develop nastier and nastier, the lads discover it troublesome to proceed, squirming of their seats and struggling to make eye contact. The tweets have a visual impact on DiCaro as effectively, at the least at first. “By the time my day of filming was over,” she writes of the expertise, “I’d heard guys calling me fat and ugly and praying for my rape so many times they didn’t register anymore.”

Produced for $300, the video, which additionally featured ESPN’s Sarah Spain, had an outsize affect, mentioned on “The View” and the “CBS Evening News.” Later, it received a Peabody Award. The video undoubtedly raised consciousness of the therapy ladies like DiCaro and Spain have needed to endure. Yet DiCaro’s e-book makes clear that situations haven’t a lot improved: A poisonous social media panorama stays considered one of many impediments to attaining gender equality on sports activities desks. After DiCaro misplaced her present in 2020 due to the pandemic, neither of Chicago’s sports activities radio stations had a feminine host.

Larry Olmsted, the creator of FANS: How Watching Sports Makes Us Happier, Healthier, and More Understanding (Algonquin, 320 pp., $25.95), isn’t a social scientist. As he admits close to the tip of his e-book, he’s not even a sports activities fan. He is “a fan of sports fans.” Olmsted mounts his case for the salubriousness of sport with the fervour of the season-ticket holder who marshals statistics, anecdotes and instinct to make the case that this is the yr the Jets will win the A.F.C. East.

Olmsted leans closely on the work of Daniel L. Wann, a professor of psychology at Murray State University, who has recognized 24 psychological health advantages of fandom. Among them, Olmsted reviews, are greater shallowness, extra conscientiousness, fewer bouts of melancholy, much less alienation and fewer anger. Julie DiCaro and Bob Stanley might need a phrase with Dr. Wann.

Source link